Untangled Health

Consumers Unite To Drive The Changes We Need

Tag: #clinica decision support

Time to pull the sheet out from underneath healthcare in America. In one step. Eliminate Insurance, Medicare, Government Programs, and see what we come up with. Please leave a note on my grave as to the outcome.

someone-to-watch

Thank you friends from LinkedIn today. Those discussing our frustration and describing a need to sit down and discuss the disaster that was and the disaster that will be.

Without action that-is!

Rephrased: My friend states our Medical system is far to complicated and polluted with bad ideas to resolve through a bunch of silo business meetings of silo organizations who define for us consumers exactly what health is, what we need to consume to maintain it and how much we should pay!

My point was to provoke: Strictly because I have similar judgments. I recently have seminar to senior men on functional decline over life for avg American male. Then overlay of possible interventions and services through death. Then described business layer and regulatory layer.
Your point Bruce Pisetzner is precisely why we need to define the pain for all stakeholders. When I say “stakeholder” I include consumers from all socio-economic classes as well as the professionals who treat them and the “business opportunities” created between 1965 and today that supposedly state a clear value added to the system of care.
Spent my career sketching iterations of your shell games. It seems to me: and I hold a straw-man judgment; that 1) as a country we have no agreement on what “health”is e.g. functional status, emotional status, absence of disease, bio-psychosocial well being etc. Far too much room to allow a free-market enterprise to explode without revisiting what is necessary to achieve healthy population goals.
Then of course we have the employer – employee entanglement.
Then of course the Government – Defined Benefit issue.
As patient with chronic disease, provider – admin acute care for 8, provider-admin post acute for 10, HIT product architect for 10 and community healthcare integration consultant for 10; predictive analyst for 8: I have watched the money flow. Oh how I have watched the money flow. Some even into my pocket. $25K a year out to stay alive and well with diabetes.
Perhaps it is time we all tell the truth. Insurance company, Large Employers, Small Employers, Provider Types, Patient Types and so on.

I created this blog post on the fly but thought it important to get out here now!

cropped-stcroix-jeff.pngsevere retinopathy

An advocate gets busy while every politician and “talking head” takes credit for healthcare model ideas published long ago.

Reconciling data in my six health portals

Reconciling data in my six health portals

I watched Barbara Starfield again last night. She passed away in 2011 but it seamed as though she was sitting in my living room telling me everything will be alright but many of us will never get our way. Barbara spent several decades studying the characteristics of health systems all over the world. Her final conclusions were simple and easy to implement as long as social agreements were made between consumers of healthcare services and their providers. The contract (sort of) is that my primary care doctor will be available when needed if I promise to contact his or her office before going to the ER for an earache or other non-emergent condition; my doctor also agrees to follow my care as I transition through life stages and address all mental and physical health conditions as they arise by assuring I connect with the correct specialist if required. The specialists in return are in constant contact with my primary care doctor so the primary care clinic is coordinating continuous and comprehensive care and reviewing all interactions between myself and other medical environments. Like I said earlier this week. Someone to watch over me. I first learned of Dr. Starfield in 2001 and followed her publications. Funny, she was never accepted to sit on any best-practice boards but the scientific community considered her work to be spectacular in terms of statistical approach and quality. In other words, she looked for the null hypothesis also.

Again…concerns over repeal and replace.

Some more diatribe with hope at sarcastic humor is written for you below. Please follow through to the end as I pasted a really cool graphic pointing you to a new society of consumers and professionals that might fix the system over the long run.

The conversation doesn’t stop at my dinner table, on my phone, through IM or Facebook. It seems as though my popularity index took a healthy bump after November 8th, 2016. I wish I could be happy about the reasons for the traffic.
“Jeff, you are on Medicare are you concerned?”

Well yes; you see, as we become older the likelihood of needing assistance from case managers, specialists, short stays in skilled nursing or rehabilitation facilities increases. Same with home health services which is always the preferred place to recover from the self-inflicted fractured hip that occurred while my masculine ego informed me of my capacity to clean out my gutters.
One of the most important changes to the clinical language coming from Obamacare is the right for all patients cared for by primary care doctors with Medicare contracts to receive “Coordinated, Comprehensive Care”. Lately you might have heard the terms: “Patient Centered Care” or “Medical Home”. You probably heard President Elect Trump mention “Patient Centered” or a new commercial by Humana presented by a handsome young doctor stating that Humana’s system of Patient Centered Care is superior because of their capacity to coordinate your care within their “medical community”. Then you will watch a local conservative pundit state: “those stupid narrow networks tried through Obamacare didn’t work: here is a toast to repeal and replace.
This stuff cracks me up for the same proponents of patient centered care realize that closely collaborating narrow networks can provide you with clinical personnel that understand your needs better than anyone else! In fact, they have the same attributes of a Patient Centered Care Team using a single medical record and plan of care to increase safety and minimize mistakes. Yet you will hear no one (perhaps save me and a few of us that are tired of scraping the poop off our boots) tell you that the words Patient Centered, Narrow Network, Accountable Outcomes, Value Added Payment, Medical Homes, and all other terms implying a tightly coordinated, error free clinical team surrounding all patients are not original concepts. In fact, they are in place in many of our successful neighbor nations who provide universal enrollment and have always demonstrated lower reliance on emergency room services for basic medicine, better health outcomes and no difference in treatment effectiveness for cancer, diabetes, cardiovascular disease and other leading causes of premature mortality. Our own CMS (The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services) have published the policy here July 2016:
So all of a sudden the administration of 2017 will be using terminology invented by others to describe care models that work after years of academic surveillance by healthcare policy analysists and already written into The Patient Protection Affordable Care Act or what the opponents call “Obama-Care”.
My prediction is we will keep the new payment systems for coordinated care and chronic disease care management. However, the credit for the success will fall under a new Trump label. My fears is that the same three insurance companies comprising the oligopoly of payers for American Healthcare will recoup their lost profits of mandated care without premium inflation for the chronically ill by shifting the premiums higher for those with pre-existing conditions. So here is another question from the week:
“Jeff, what will I do now I couldn’t get covered because of my history of cancer before the ACA?” “What if “Trump-care” requires coverage for pre-existing illnesses but allows insurance companies to include the illness in the premium pricing model? “ My response to this question was “not sure, my cost in the NC High Risk Insurance Pool for my diabetes prior to Obamacare was $1200.00 per month not including co-pays. Today it is $350.00.
More on Patient Centered Care AKA Medical Homes AKA Integrated Care AKA Chronic Illness Care.
I discussed the integrated care model and its payment adjustments to my Men’s group on Thursday night as they requested a primer on planning for their last ten years of life. Their hope was that our system of care had evolved and they would not have to lose their homes to cover the long-term care charges. Many of the guys in my group neglected to buy long term care insurance when they were young and healthy, had since suffered a chronic disease diagnosis and episode of treatment and no longer qualified for long term care insurance. They could however place $10 K per month into an account to pre-pay up to one year of long term care. This is what my father did: In 2006 he entered into a contract with a transitional care organization. He paid them $350,000 for full access to assisted living and long term care until his death. They also allowed him to live in the attached apartment complex for independent seniors for an additional rent of $3200 per month including one meal per day. Not a bad deal eh? Oh yeah…one more oversight: My friends ; all retired upper middle class professionals had no idea that Medicare didn’t pay for long term custodial care either in home or inpatient facility.
Now, like I said the other day, I am a bit tired of shouting the truth to those who were unfortunate enough to buy into the following promise: “Oh we will have the most wonderful healthcare system in the world” and “We promise to repeal the expensive policies and replace with something better.
We were on our way folks: The biggest mistake, President Obama’s team was denied the necessary Medicaid expansion for ALL not SOME States by our supreme courts. If you don’t understand the math I will be pleased to describe it in another column. Basically when the folks that would have had access to Medicaid don’t receive the insurance they still consume services. The loss of revenue winds up on the balance sheets of hospitals and providers and they respond by increasing their cost per service. The insurance companies pay more and your premiums increase. So… my neighbors policy (55 year old male) in NC costs $11,000 per year. The very same policy in New Hampshire where they expanded Medicaid costs $5,500 per year. As Mr. Obama leaves keep in mind that the rate of increase in health costs since the inception of Obama Care is the lowest it has been in 40 years.
Somehow, someway; we need to cover everybody. If we do not we cannot cover the losses incurred in the private sector without the Magical Thinking that has been sold you for so many decade. Hide the losses, get others to pay for the losses through modest increases in cost of living and blame the doctors, and hospitals who give away more free care than you could ever imagine.
What would happen if our incredible consumer driven internet harnessed the decision support technology that we use daily on Amazon and instantly brings the right service to you when needed should you or a loved one become ill? What if we harnessed IBM Watson to make the diagnosis thereby reducing error rates and reducing unnecessary utilization of expensive diagnostic procedures?
What if we didn’t need insurance companies any more to assess population risk and perform preauthorization services while we waited for our new medication?
Since we have all of the data connecting lifestyle, culture, nutrition, infection and the human genome can anyone appreciate where we are headed with our capacity to discover the cause of disease and effect of treatment? This is not decades from now my friends; it is within the reach of our children’s lifetime. I have wonderful friends with incredible scientific minds that are creating open source technologies to accomplish human collaboration like humankind has never witnessed. The only barrier to their success is a loss of priority to cure disease, increase well-being and expand the functional-years of human life.
Or…we can keep these technologies secret, forget those we have developed through the natural sequestration of competing private enterprise and traditional silo thinking. If this is where we are headed then the best investment to assure a painless end of life if you are not surrounded by humanitarian friends is my undying support for the second amendment. If you catch my drift.

Check out Right Care Folks!

Right Care Now

Right Care Now

Doctor Price? Should we run for the hills?

A serene day in St. Croix

 

His history might clue you in.

Tom Price on healthcare: What should we expect?

What happens when you strip coordinated care incentives through repeal of the PPACA. One outcome is certain: orthopedic surgeons like Dr. Price perform more amputations for which they receive several thousand dollars for a fifteen minute procedure.

What happens when you strip coordinated care incentives through repeal of the PPACA.
One outcome is certain: orthopedic surgeons like Dr. Price perform more amputations for which they receive several thousand dollars for a fifteen minute procedure.

Click link above to access Dr. Price’s priorities. First please read my fears, doubts and insecurities below?

 

 

 

Pres. Elect Trump hired Rep. Tom Price as the new Director of US HHS today.
Mr. Price is a vocal supporter of Mr. Trump when other republicans were not. It appears Mr. Trump continues to hire loyalists.
Dr. Price is a successful physician having authored numerous bills to replace PPACA. When hired he stated his objective is to repeal and replace.
The bills authored by Price do have language that sounds attractive e.g. Patient Empowerment but when read…show a clear intent to remove the most important economic controls on health cost escalation in the PPACA. These include: DME competitive bidding for items such as prosthetics, motorized wheelchairs etc. Competitive bidding on drugs purchased by Medicaid and Medicare, Removal of our veto on using genetic data to derive insurance premiums for individuals and many more.

I have long thought that it is weird that Americans who place so much emphasis on pure free market tactics in all industries vote for politicians that author bills to veto competitive pricing virtually eliminating 100 million people from hiring a government payer to reduce the cost of medicine.

Now, I always suggest we follow the money.
Dr. Price’s three leading PACs and individual campaign contributors fall within these industry’s.
Physician Membership Organizations
Hospital Systems including HCA ( brought to testify on anti trust and fraud several times in front of congressional committees)
Pharmaceutical Industry
Insurance Industry

Where I have worked for HCA, consulted to the American Academy of Family Practice, Anthem Blue Cross, NY BC, and State Government I am confident in my conclusions about their business objectives. If you trust me and want more info please feel free to call on me.

I highly suggest that everyone who voted for PETUS look at who has been appointed to lead US agencies and fill important cabinet posts. My prediction and I hope to eat my words is that the middle class is about to be dealt a final death-blow that will eliminate any hope of having enough left over at our death to pass on to future generations.
I am suggesting people like myself: aging with chronic illness describe what they hope for quality of life in their final years and make preparations. The only way to do this is to understand how necessities are priced and determine individual bargains strength.
We had Price transparency tools created through the PPACA. My guess is they will disappear in short order .

My colleagues who believe in universal enrollment for defined evidence based public health and personal health interventions will be fighting any changes that do not provide consumer-facing competitive shopping tools that dispense with confusing terminology commonly used by healthcare institutions and insurance organizations. I also look to the millennial to jump in since they have a future at stake.
Tony Antony Williams may be right in his suggestion that PETUS is a liar.

Doing my best to stay healthy enough to escalate beyond the occasional battle into a Full Blown War against Wall Street.

The War in DC is for campaign reform and term limits.

“Oh what a drag it is getting old”

What is important! Life, Death and Taxes

Hopeful

Hopeful

The most important messages I carry are personally empowering. They are seldom original but channeled through the “bright spirits” I encounter in life.

To be empowered in this confusing world requires a grasp on reality. I will be 60 next week, a milestone I never cherished; even less so today with recent memory of the loss of my father, mother, brother and best friend of 30 plus years.
I was so freaking sad today when I woke that I found it hard to make a cup of coffee. I preferred to sit in my armchair (nicknamed the neurotic’s spaceship) and discuss the meaning of life with Bodi my loyal canine friend.
When I opened my social portal into the virtual world I discovered a friend’s post. A warm soul I met in a business conference two years ago, April Koontz had posted an important message; another piece of wisdom that I find to be a blessing for all of us.
I have chosen to teach about how to survive in America if one is ill perhaps it is time to focus on the ultimate reality for my lifetime. I will not witness a fix. We are far from agreement on the definition of health and well-being and human rights in American Society to imagine anything close to a satisfactory solution in my generation.

 

So perhaps I will continue to post interesting tidbits and ideas with hope of enlightening those who did not work 35 years in healthcare; but most importantly I will re-state my agreement with the video below; a presentation by @Michael Hebb, the founder of Death Over Dinner’s Ted Talk below – a must see!

A great thanks to April for bringing this to my breakfast table this morning.

Patient commits suicide faulting pharmaceutical prior authorization rules as the cause.

Many untold stories

 

Patient commits suicide claiming prior authorization pharmaceutical rules as the cause.

Melt down, do you ever have them?

Well I will share mine with the world in this very moment.

I have carried hepatitis c for thirty-eight years now. That is until two days ago when my blood work returned the result of no detectable virus.

My family’s cheer is magnificent as everyone had considered this diagnosis to be the reason for my premature demise.

The medication I am taking (Harvoni) was approved for 90 days by the Federal Blue Cross program and I am now completing the second month of therapy. The protocol calls for 12 weeks of therapy due to a history of viral re-emergence using an 8 week protocol. We were lucky to get the medication as one course of therapy is $100,000! That is in the USA of course. In Egypt it is $1000.

CVS Care Mark was denied my refill as the date of the prior authorization expiration is tomorrow. That’s right TOMORROW!!!

It turns out that the Blue Cross administered program has a 24 hour lead time required for refills. Their internal processes begin flagging patients for cancellation one day before the actual term date!

So here I sit, just another patient with a life threatening illness who was given the hope of cure one week ago and now is pedaling as fast as he can to get help from his physician to extend the authorization of a medicine that is –on paper- still authorized!

They tell us patients with chronic disease that we are subject to depression. Feelings of hopelessness, loss of energy, inability to concentrate, suicidal ideation: Well I have all of them now. After 48 years of chronic disease, a 33 year career in healthcare where I operated at executive levels high enough to find out some ‘very ugly truths’ regarding this sector of the free market I feel ready to throw in the towel.

So for the next generation of patients: know this…you are on your own. This means it is up to you to find the best team of physicians, nurses, employers, insurance companies and friends to respond to your needs. It will be up to you to command them. It is time to stop being a passenger in the system.

I am the captain of my vessel. I have a wonderful team who is trying their hardest to get me the final dose of medication needed to save my life. I have just been wounded brother and sister so I will lay here for a while and bleed. Then –with your help; I will stand-up and continue telling my truth.

The truth that spills forth in the form of factual events involving actual people making life and death decisions has been held back until this point. I still try to earn a few dollars in the industry and do not want to become one of the untouchables. Perhaps it is time to execute my right to free speech.

When I am done I will rest and figure out another strategy for supplemental income in retirement.  It might be time to close this chapter and dance.

NC Continues to brainwash its citizens

 

We are dropped from the universe into loving hands (unfortunately not for all though)

We are dropped from the universe into loving hands (unfortunately not for all though)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

This is a recent opinion from Brian Balfour of Raleigh’s Civitas Institute. My response follows.

From Raleigh News and Observer Saturday December 28, 2014

Last week, yet another study claiming that expanding Medicaid in North Carolina would create tens of thousands of jobs was released and dutifully reported by the media. The findings of such studies, however, are based upon a fatally flawed assumption that Medicaid coverage equates to access to medical care.

The latest report, produced by George Washington University researchers, declares that North Carolina will miss out on 43,000 jobs in the next five years, along with $21 billion in federal money, if it continues to refuse Medicaid expansion as prescribed in Obamacare. The study’s findings largely echo other recent reports, such as a January study produced by the North Carolina Institute of Medicine that came to similar conclusions.

The job growth claims are based on the state’s “drawing down” additional federal funds due to Medicaid expansion. As the GWU report describes, “Since most of the cost of a Medicaid expansion would be borne by the federal government, expansion would result in billions of dollars in additional federal funding flowing into North Carolina. These funds will initially be paid to health care providers, such as hospitals, clinics or pharmacies, as health care payments for Medicaid services.”

This income received by health care providers is then spent on suppliers (such as medicine, medical supplies) and in their community on goods and services such as groceries, clothes and movies.

The fatal flaw in this methodology, however, is that in order to “draw down” federal Medicaid dollars, actual medical services need to be provided to Medicaid patients. It is only when doctors actually treat Medicaid patients that the federal government pays those providers for the services.

 

For instance, the NCIOM study assumes that more than 500,000 North Carolinians will not only enroll in Medicaid under expansion, but each would receive on average roughly $4,300 in medical services each year. As these services are rendered, the doctors and hospitals are paid by the federal Medicaid program, which injects the money into the state’s economy and spurs the job creation, according to the studies.

But here’s where the studies’ jobs claims fall apart: North Carolina already suffers from a shortage of doctors.

According to federal guidelines, 78 counties in North Carolina qualify as Health Professional Shortage Areas because of shortages of primary medical care doctors. And the problem is getting worse. According to the Shep’s Center for Health Services Research at UNC-Chapel Hill, North Carolina’s supply of primary care physicians is dwindling, dropping from 9.4 per 10,000 people in 2010 to 7.9 doctors per 10,000 people in 2011.

Indeed, a 2011 survey by the Association of American Medical Colleges found that only 15 states have fewer primary care physicians per capita than North Carolina. The doctor shortage is especially pronounced in the state’s rural areas, where there is a greater concentration of Medicaid enrollees as a share of the population.

And more to the point, not only is there a general doctor shortage in North Carolina, there is a shortage of doctors accepting Medicaid patients.

Medicaid roles in North Carolina have ballooned from about 1 million in 2003 to roughly 1.7 million today. Adding another 500,000 would push the program over 2 million enrollees and mark more than a million new Medicaid patients in a dozen years.

All this would take place when the number of physicians accepting Medicaid patients is dwindling.

Imagine adding since 2003 the equivalent of the entire population of Wake County to a group of people fighting over a shrinking pool of doctors. Making matters worse, a 2012 article in Health Affairs found that one-fourth of North Carolina’s physicians will not take any new Medicaid patients.

In short, there simply is not nearly enough doctors to meet the demand, and things could get worse.

As reported recently by WRAL, “A survey this year by The Physicians Foundation found that 81 percent of doctors describe themselves as either over-extended or at full capacity, and 44 percent said they planned to cut back on the number of patients they see, retire, work part-time or close their practice to new patients.”

Such extreme supply constraints tells us that if North Carolina were to expand Medicaid, the newly enrolled would have great difficulty actually seeing a doctor. Coverage will not equal access.

If new enrollees in the already overcrowded Medicaid program don’t have access to care, then there won’t be any services provided. With no services provided, no federal dollars are “drawn down” to Medicaid providers. The whole premise behind the studies purporting to show job creation is unsupportable.

Brian Balfour is policy director of the Civitas Institute in Raleigh.

Read more here: http://www.newsobserver.com/2014/12/26/4427841/why-medicaid-expansion-wont-boost.html?sp=/99/108/#storylink=cpy

 

 

Untangled Health’s Response

Jeffrey Harris · Consultant Community Medical Home Implementation: PCPCC Co-Chair e-Health Group; Director Diabetes Eyesight Preservation Program Taylor Retina Center
I am writing In response to Brian Balfour’ opinion on the relationship between expanding Medicaid in NC and job growth on Saturday December 28, 2014.

The man standing next to me in Church in Four Oaks NC in 2011 said; “you must have sugar”; as he observed me checking my blood with a finger stick. “Sure do brother I said, since the age of 10, this is my 44th year with diabetes, I assume you have the disease also.” “Sure do, runs in my family: I am scheduled to have several toes amputated next week.” I could not help but notice the soft cast and bandage on his leg and told him I was sorry that he had to be the victim of such an avoidable circumstance. “Avoidable?” he said; this happens to everyone in my family; we all assume it is par for the course.”
These are the people who would receive coverage under Medicaid expansion should NC decide to follow the recommendation of the Federal Government under the Affordable Care Act. In fact, more than 400,000 of these people who are presently uninsured would have a source of payment for Medical Care. I know them well as I was one and if not for the generosity of friends would have gone without insulin on several occasions in my life.
On Saturday, Brian Balfour, policy director of the Civitas Institute in Raleigh demonstrated a common misunderstanding of health economics. He states NC will not expand Jobs through accepting Federal Medicaid expansion money because we historically have underserved areas with few physicians who cannot expand their caseloads. I guess this means that in a free market society if a geographical area in need of services receives funding and resources to increase their supply of services that the suppliers of such services (Community Clinics, Medical Schools) will not increase the capacity of the delivery system?
Mr. Balfour further fails to recognize that these patients are already receiving treatment often for free in local emergency departments, further inflating the cost of healthcare to the insured.
By the way, Mr. Balfour fails to recognize that North Carolina wrote the book on how to provide Medicaid coordinated care through a Primary Care Medical home which has served as the ‘how-to’ guide for numerous other states (Community Care of NC).
Let’s see: Where Mr. Balfour is correct with regard to our need to expand the number of primary care physicians we have multiple mechanisms in place through ACA that are making the profession of primary care medicine much more attractive. I point the reader to one of many publications demonstrating the return on investment for engaging individuals in patient centered primary care Profiles in interprofessional health training. Since President Bush called for the adoption of electronic health record technology we are now well passed the early adopter stage of connected information systems that allow us to find large segments of our population that require access to specialty care thereby prospectively catching the crisis before it occurs and saving all stakeholders time and money; but more importantly mitigating the risk for the permanent suffering that arises from poorly managed chronic disease. Telemedicine is now a recognized intervention and carries a reasonable fee for patients and doctors to feel as though they receive a fair exchange in value (wellness for the patient and salary’s for the doctor’s practice). One thing any student of economics learns is that investments in technology and advancements in process favor a positive shift in the supply demand curve and its derivative…productivity. Let me recap: New tech, new care coordinating jobs, new analysts’ jobs = MORE JOBS!
In my work I spend a great deal of time assisting the public with the interpretation of so-called facts and opinions arising through think-tanks and praised by the media. I am confident in my judgment that NC Medicaid should expand in accordance with ACA policy. So are the Vice President of the IBM Global Health Initiative, our Governor and every other well versed healthcare economist regardless of political party affiliation. I suggest you do some of your own reading (reports vs opinions like mine). Good luck to my 400000 friends that are deprived of fair health care services when they are ill.
One more thing:
Physicians are willing to treat Medicaid patients. I spend my time looking for specialty care. And have located retina surgeons willing to treat diabetics regardless of funding: Simply to preserve eyesight.
Jeffrey Harris
Consulting Program Manager Taylor Retinal Center
Co-Chair Patient Centered Primary Care Collaborative Washington DC

An expression of gratitude for my first $28,000 bottle of Harvoni!

Can believe NC?

Can believe NC?

Last week I published my offer to not accept resuscitation services in exchange for a full course of treatment with Harvoni, the new Direct Acting Antiviral from Gilead that has demonstrated a 95% cure rate in Hepatitis C patients with genotype 1.

In most cases insurance companies, Medicaid and Medicare is not paying for the medication unless the patient has end stage cirrhosis and is queued for transplant. The reason is easy to understand from an economic perspective yet certainly Draconian when it comes to well over 2 million people in the US who suffer with this debilitating illness. Furthermore the price discrepancy between countries is 94 X when comparing egypt and the USA for example. 

In the US a 1 month supply of Harvoni is $30,000; in Egypt it is $320.00

For more, please see my slide presentation below. For now, I want to thank Federal Employee Blue Cross for covering this medication as well as my much needed continuous ambulatory blood sugar equipment which makes this diabetic completely able bodied when away from home and alone.

 

 

I do not know how or why I was approved. Neither does my hepatology doctor. Both he and I were in tears when the fax came in through his prior approval desk. I am now in my third day of therapy. 

All I did was write a story on my blog and link it to facebook, linkedin, twitter etc. Within 24 hours my friends at Humana had retweeted my message and called me to see if they could help. They were not even my insurance company but this is a great example of how some payers are monitoring the internet for clients in need. 

Human did not get back to me but within two more days we had the approval from Federal Employee Blue Cross (my wifes health insurance). Since they are acting as secondary to my Ordinary Medicare the authorization was up to them. 

So whoever you are at Blue Cross, this is one lucky American who thanks you for the generosity to step outside most payers protocol and save my life. 

What a Christmas Present. 

 

THE POST FROM LAST WEEK

I will happily select a DNR status if you pay for my Hep C Treatment 

Hopeful

Hopeful

An economic model for exchange of value between patient and payer.

 Dear America,

I have been notified by both Medicare and Blue Cross that the technology I use for tracking my blood sugar trends will no longer be covered.

I have been notified by both Medicare and Blue Cross that the antiviral medication which has come on the market to cure my Hepatitis C will not be covered.

I would like to negotiate for coverage of these technologies using my history as a patient and known economic data regarding the cost of care at the end of life as a proposed value exchange. 

I understand that the insurance industry AND public sector should grind their teeth when presented with the $1000 per pill cost of the new therapy’s. I also imagine payers are stratifying patients needing transplant for first access to care since the drugs work on damaged livers. What I do not understand is the 287/1 disparity in cost between America and Egypt?

 

Hooray Humana for providing useful tools to family caregivers.

Yikes!!

Yikes!!

Lately I have complained about the lack of utility if not barriers created by various e- communication tools that seem to complicate the process of educating consumers on the topics within the domain of self-mastery.
After losing my poa agreement with my father, Humana finally
Let me know that I am now Pop’s designated healthcare proxy.
I find the letter engaging with plenty of contact info content and a promise to send me a care-advocates guidebook with accompanying educational material for visit preparation, medication reconciliation and financial management.
I will let you know how useful it is when received.

For now, a gratuitous thank you to a payer stepping into the medical home care team role with both patient and family!

Not an insurance company, just an empowered consumer.

Hopeful

Hopeful

My report for today:

Helped one more person register his family for an affordable insurance product using Healthcare.gov

Sequence

Met friend at 4:00 for dinner prior to our club meeting. Turn’s out he is lost in acronyms and asked for help.

Over the course of the next four hours we improved his ability to self-advocate, submitted an application and lessened his anger and fear of OBAMACARE.

My objective was met by my friends eloquent ability to inform his teacher of the many reasons OBAMACARE should have never been named OBAMACARE and his understanding of healthcare as it differed from earlier in the day when he could only think of it as “the monthly premium “or the cost of a subspecialists co-pay”; or “a communist scam”.

We ended the night with one happy conservative family man receiving a quote for his silver policy for a family of three. The monthly premium is $200 less than last years and his services have increased.

As we concluded the evening he asked if I ever thought of inventing a software program that would track all important health information for patients.  He had evidently been responsible for a $4000 co-pay on an $18,000 ER visit for chest-pain. This was mostly due to his inability to articulate a thorough history to the doctors on staff.

I described to him the importance of maintaining a relationship with a primary care physician and then logged on to MyHealthRecord at Duke and MS Health-Vault to demonstrate the rather rough but much better communication I had with my physicians and interoperability of pharmacy and EMR systems. Then I described how these data could be used to empower a person in an emergency with timely and acurate information. His conclusion: Jeesh, I probably would not have needed the expensive work-up if the doctors had access to all these studies!

One more convert.

So little time….

But one more convert.

Tomorrow’s agenda: Meet with ophthalmology practice to organize diabetic eyesight preservation program for non-Medicaid, uninsured folks in NC. So far, I have the cost of a vitrectomy reduced from $12000 at a local hospital to $4800. Not bad for a days work!

Jeff Harris

Not an insurance company, just an empowered consumer.

Seeing the Invisible: Desperate for dental work, an all-night wait

Seeing the Invisible: Desperate for dental work, an all-night wait | Seeing the invisible | NewsObserver.com

 

The invisible North Carolinian waits in line for relief of pain

From Raleigh News and Observer Sunday August 25, 2013

 

I beg all to share this article on our dental care system in. North Carolina. This is only one example of a crumbling infrastructure as the policy makers in Raleigh decide to not accept solutions.

 

Since election of new state legislature and GOVERNOR MCCRORY

Highest unemployment rate:

  • Decision to end extended unemployment

Lowest teacher pay

  • No pay increase.
  • Yet. Pay to Governor Staff increased to $120K as he states “they need a livable wage”.

One of the most notable Medicaid Primary Care systems in the country with improvement in health quality and reduction in health cost for many years now.

  • Yet the legislature and Gov. decide to not accept sustainable Federal reimbursement for increasing enrollment in Medicaid, making healthcare unavailable to 500,000 people.

Reduction in substance abuse detoxification beds

  • Yet we have some of the highest rates of addiction and alcohol related teenage fatalities in the US.

Stipend for food stamps…..nah

Need so many papers to vote; it is as difficult as my Jewish relatives’ attempts to leave Germany in 1943.

Decision to not create a health exchange leaving a 3 company oligopoly to set insurance rates due to lack of competition.

The people standing in line for dental care in this photo are our neighbors. Can you imagine needing a root canal, being unable to eat, experiencing severe pain every time you had a drink of soda? Then being denied care?

Is this how it was in the 30’s Dad?

 HELP! The new Director of HHS has hired a 24 year-old with no experience in Public Health to be her policy adviser and his salary is $85,000; more than twice the pay of a teacher with a master’s degree.

Oh yeah, we won’t pay salary differential to teachers who achieve graduate level degree in education!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seeing the Invisible: Desperate for dental work, an all-night wait | Seeing the invisible | NewsObserver.com.